<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ambient Feed Reading</title>
	<atom:link href="http://iam.peteashton.com/ambient-feed-reading/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://iam.peteashton.com/ambient-feed-reading/</link>
	<description>That is who I am</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2012 20:15:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dp</title>
		<link>http://iam.peteashton.com/ambient-feed-reading/comment-page-1/#comment-3013</link>
		<dc:creator>dp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 10:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ash10.com/?p=25#comment-3013</guid>
		<description>Technorati keyword search does something like a peripheral aggregation, but not as well as I&#039;d like. What would be really nice is a two stage search, where it finds material based on an explicit keyword, then looks for tags or text using a glossary I provide, and ranks the results according to the match rate. I can imagine Delicious having this sort of search function, where it uses a bundle to search the web for other bundles or similar groupings of text.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Technorati keyword search does something like a peripheral aggregation, but not as well as I&#8217;d like. What would be really nice is a two stage search, where it finds material based on an explicit keyword, then looks for tags or text using a glossary I provide, and ranks the results according to the match rate. I can imagine Delicious having this sort of search function, where it uses a bundle to search the web for other bundles or similar groupings of text.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alice</title>
		<link>http://iam.peteashton.com/ambient-feed-reading/comment-page-1/#comment-3012</link>
		<dc:creator>alice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 17:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ash10.com/?p=25#comment-3012</guid>
		<description>Hmm yes this is very interesting. I use Bloglines Beta and at this moment it has 16080 unread. I am not too worried about it though as I drag any blogs that are essential reading up to the top of my list to check daily (about 25) and then skim read the rest when I need a hit of inspiration, and as they are mostly creative or culinary that is quite easy to do as it is mostly image based. I also advocate a one-in-one-out policy wherein when I add an RSS then I delete an older one that is no longer relevant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm yes this is very interesting. I use Bloglines Beta and at this moment it has 16080 unread. I am not too worried about it though as I drag any blogs that are essential reading up to the top of my list to check daily (about 25) and then skim read the rest when I need a hit of inspiration, and as they are mostly creative or culinary that is quite easy to do as it is mostly image based. I also advocate a one-in-one-out policy wherein when I add an RSS then I delete an older one that is no longer relevant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Bounds</title>
		<link>http://iam.peteashton.com/ambient-feed-reading/comment-page-1/#comment-3011</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Bounds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 09:15:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ash10.com/?p=25#comment-3011</guid>
		<description>Ah, and the BiNS blogroll is dumped straight from my &quot;Birmingham Blogs&quot; Google Reader folder – one I very much skim-read. Skim-read so you don&#039;t have to ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, and the BiNS blogroll is dumped straight from my &#8220;Birmingham Blogs&#8221; Google Reader folder – one I very much skim-read. Skim-read so you don&#8217;t have to ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Bounds</title>
		<link>http://iam.peteashton.com/ambient-feed-reading/comment-page-1/#comment-3010</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Bounds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 09:14:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ash10.com/?p=25#comment-3010</guid>
		<description>Interesting post Pete, I&#039;m not sure I have either a feed-reading or email strategy — expect not letting things build up. That said, I&#039;m going to write mine down anyway…

I tend not to worry about the &quot;unread items&quot; score as it&#039;s so often photos of cats, or search feeds I monitor. Things I&#039;d like to see, bit I&#039;m not so bothered if I miss them. 

In Google Reader I do have some folders that I read intently and won&#039;t miss. Some that I skim and &#039;star&#039; for later (mostly long articles and videos that I need to concentrate on).Some that I never read and just periodically &quot;mark as read&quot; — I&#039;m using GReader&#039;s search facility here, so I can find them if I need them.

In this instance I&#039;m thinking the solution could be partly at least technical. Google Reader could kill all the friendfeed type sites if it added a few features &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jonbounds.co.uk/blog/263/new-feature-wishlist-for-google-reader/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;some I wished for here&lt;/a&gt;.

And I guess you&#039;re right - like twitter it&#039;s best not to think you have to read all the small stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting post Pete, I&#8217;m not sure I have either a feed-reading or email strategy — expect not letting things build up. That said, I&#8217;m going to write mine down anyway…</p>
<p>I tend not to worry about the &#8220;unread items&#8221; score as it&#8217;s so often photos of cats, or search feeds I monitor. Things I&#8217;d like to see, bit I&#8217;m not so bothered if I miss them. </p>
<p>In Google Reader I do have some folders that I read intently and won&#8217;t miss. Some that I skim and &#8216;star&#8217; for later (mostly long articles and videos that I need to concentrate on).Some that I never read and just periodically &#8220;mark as read&#8221; — I&#8217;m using GReader&#8217;s search facility here, so I can find them if I need them.</p>
<p>In this instance I&#8217;m thinking the solution could be partly at least technical. Google Reader could kill all the friendfeed type sites if it added a few features <a href="http://www.jonbounds.co.uk/blog/263/new-feature-wishlist-for-google-reader/" rel="nofollow">some I wished for here</a>.</p>
<p>And I guess you&#8217;re right &#8211; like twitter it&#8217;s best not to think you have to read all the small stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

