<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Personal Colour</title>
	<atom:link href="http://iam.peteashton.com/personal-colour/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://iam.peteashton.com/personal-colour/</link>
	<description>That is who I am</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2012 20:15:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Ashton</title>
		<link>http://iam.peteashton.com/personal-colour/comment-page-1/#comment-2996</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Ashton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 20:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ash10.com/?p=17#comment-2996</guid>
		<description>I should have emphasised, or even made, the point that it&#039;s blogs like Colour &lt;i&gt;in aggregate&lt;/i&gt; that make them more interesting that a single site like CiB. You need everyone who&#039;s doing interesting stuff to run a blog or similar for it to work. And also the criteria of useful/interesting is important and not one I think can be settled on easily. 

I think my big point is while CiB, etc are very important they&#039;re not the best examples for others to be inspired by and they don&#039;t, on the whole, reflect what the &lt;i&gt;people&lt;/i&gt; of an area are like. It&#039;s that personal, whimsical stuff that reflects the character of a city much better than info about stuff that&#039;s going on (as vital as the latter is).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should have emphasised, or even made, the point that it&#8217;s blogs like Colour <i>in aggregate</i> that make them more interesting that a single site like CiB. You need everyone who&#8217;s doing interesting stuff to run a blog or similar for it to work. And also the criteria of useful/interesting is important and not one I think can be settled on easily. </p>
<p>I think my big point is while CiB, etc are very important they&#8217;re not the best examples for others to be inspired by and they don&#8217;t, on the whole, reflect what the <i>people</i> of an area are like. It&#8217;s that personal, whimsical stuff that reflects the character of a city much better than info about stuff that&#8217;s going on (as vital as the latter is).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://iam.peteashton.com/personal-colour/comment-page-1/#comment-2995</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 18:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ash10.com/?p=17#comment-2995</guid>
		<description>I agree whole-heartedly with points 2-4 but I&#039;m not sure the comparison in your first point works - Colour and CW share a format but are very different beasts.

In terms of usefulness, if I didn&#039;t know Wolverhampton (and I don&#039;t really) CW gives me information about all sorts of things that I can dip into.  Colour tells me what the people who run one night there are into.  Is that interesting?  Yeah.  Useful?  On its own I&#039;d say not - you&#039;d need a spread of blogs of a similar ilk and together they would be useful.

Anyway, surely accusing CiB, CW, BiNS, etc of being insular is like accusing water of being wet - that&#039;s their whole essence and there&#039;s value in being geographically single-minded as you&#039;ve proven yourself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree whole-heartedly with points 2-4 but I&#8217;m not sure the comparison in your first point works &#8211; Colour and CW share a format but are very different beasts.</p>
<p>In terms of usefulness, if I didn&#8217;t know Wolverhampton (and I don&#8217;t really) CW gives me information about all sorts of things that I can dip into.  Colour tells me what the people who run one night there are into.  Is that interesting?  Yeah.  Useful?  On its own I&#8217;d say not &#8211; you&#8217;d need a spread of blogs of a similar ilk and together they would be useful.</p>
<p>Anyway, surely accusing CiB, CW, BiNS, etc of being insular is like accusing water of being wet &#8211; that&#8217;s their whole essence and there&#8217;s value in being geographically single-minded as you&#8217;ve proven yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

